Volunteering

A Tantalising Fragment

By Liz, who is a volunteer with the Bawdy Courts of Lichfield project and is part of the volunteer group.

John Shaw, former churchwarden of All Saints, Derby

Elizabeth Floyde, his daughter

Gilbert, son of Gilbert Okes, native of Derby, a witness

Elizabeth, wife of Edward Moore, native of Derby, a witness

Robert Sleigh, another former churchwarden of All Saints, Derby

Doctor Clarke, assumed to be archdeacon Edward Willmote, doctor of divinity

Daniel Eyre, vicar of St Werberg, Derby

John Wyersdale, vicar of St Peter, Derby

Willington, employer of Elizabeth Moore

A single sheet is all that survives of a case brought before the consistory court in 1640. Ten names are included and it is akin to the prologue of a stage presentation: ten characters are paraded for our inspection and the plot is alluded to. The leading lady is notorious throughout the parishes of the town of Derby, but, before details of the plot can be unfolded, the final curtain is rung down.

Like players on a stage: A miniature theatre from the County Museum collection.

In this surviving fragment, John Shaw, former churchwarden of All Saints’, Derby, cited Gilbert Okes and Elizabeth Moore of Derby to appear at the Consistory Court to witness in a case concerning the slandering of his daughter, Elizabeth Floyd. The supposed lewdness of his daughter had already been reported verbally by John Shaw and his fellow churchwarden to Dr Clarke, presumably the archdeacon, at his Easter visitation. Three clergymen of Derby confirmed that the woman’s lewdness was commonly reported throughout the town.

Following the presentment made to Dr Clarke, Elizabeth Floyde was “forthwith sent to London and soe never purged or cleared herselfe by any course of lawe.” Who sent her? Why did she go? As her guilt had not been established, Gilbert Okes and Elizabeth Moore were left in limbo. It was the business of the court to take action “that the guilty may be blamed, and shamed, but that the sayd Gilbert and Elizabeth may bee cleared & discharged, being (as wee suppose) in this matter innocent and guiltless”. There appear to be two threads to the story: the lewdness or otherwise of Elizabeth Floyd, and the establishment and reinstatement of the good character of Elizabeth Moore and Gilbert Okes. Elizabeth Moore’s good name was vouched for by Mr Willington, whose servant she had been for five years.

In normal times the long arm of the ecclesiastical law might have pursued Elizabeth Floyde to London, or found some means of finalising the case. But these were not normal times. By 1640 the country was riven with religious and political discontent leading up to the outbreak of open warfare and bloodshed in the civil war two years later. William Laud, the high church archbishop of Canterbury, was imprisoned in 1640 for treason and subsequently executed. In 1641 the Puritan Long Parliament prohibited the ecclesiastical courts from punishing any spiriitual or moral crime, and in 1646 these courts were annulled along with the abolition of the episcopacy.

In Lichfield itself, the cathedral, home of the consistory court, was used as a fortess by both sides in the conflict. During the third siege Royalist cannon sent the centre steeple crashing down on the main roof, leaving the cathedral a useless ruin.

In the circumstances it is a marvel that the consistory court papers were preserved. This case of slander may not have concluded or perhaps never been properly filed. But somehow this single sheet, this tantalising fragment, has survived.

B/C/5/1640/5

‘These be to certify this worshipfull Court or any whom it may Concerne that wheras Gilbert son of Gilbert Okes, & Elizabeth wife of Edward Moore both borne in Darby, and for any things we know, or can heare of are and ever have beene of Honest life and Conversation, and not given to slaunder or defame any one wrongfully: Yet as wee understand are sited by meanes of one John Shaw to appear at this Court Concerning a supposed Slaundering of his daughter Elizabeth Foyde the matter was publiquely famed to be notorious, and the manner of it was seene and observed by others besydes the sayd Gilbert & Elizabeth and was presented by word of mouth to Doctor Clarke himself at his last visitation, by Robert Sleigh and John Shaw aforesayd then Churchwardens, as witnesseth the sayd Robert Sleighs hand hereunto annexed: but the sayd Elizabeth Floyd was forthwith sent to London, and soe never purged or cleared her selfe by any Course of lawe.

These be therfore ernestly to request this worshipful court to consider the premises, and to take such course that the guilty may be blamed, and shamed, but that the sayd Gilbert and Elizabeth may be cleared and discharged, being (as we suppose) in this matter innocent and guiltless’

B/C/5/1640/5

‘There is a common & (as we believe) a true report of the Lewdness of John Shaw’s daughter Edward Willmotte Dr of Divinity

Lub Whittington Elizabeth more was servant to mee at Least five yeares & did behave herself honestlie

Daniel Eyre vicar of St Wereburge in Darbie This former report I often heard John Wyersdale vicar of St Peters in Derby

Robert Sleigh then Churchwarde with John Shaw of the parish of all Saintes in Darby when the matter was broched who certfyed dockter Clarke of ye report of it at his visitation nexte ester’

Research

How Do We Place Events in Time?

Hello, I’m Susie, the newest member of the Lichfield Bawdy Courts team. I am completing a PhD in History at Keele University in partnership with Staffordshire Archives and Heritage.  My background is in archaeology, focusing on social history through documents, artefacts and architecture from 1650 onwards. Some of the projects I’ve worked on include how students of different social classes were separated in school buildings in the 18th and 19th centuries, and the experiences of displaced persons in Britain immediately after the Second World War. 

Susie wearing headphone smiling at the camera. Behind her is Gaudi's work in Barcelona.
Susie in the courtyard of Gaudi’s Casa Batllo, Barcelona.

For my PhD I will be exploring how individuals place events in time. Imagine you are sitting at home and you hear a loud crashing sound. A month later you are visited by the police and asked when you heard the crashing sound. How would you answer? What methods would you use to describe the date and time of the event? Can you think of any methods which do not use technology?

In modern times, we can relate events to time using clocks, our phones, calendars, what was on the TV, and many other accurate methods. My PhD will investigate how people did this before these things were invented by using witness testimonies across three centuries and geographic areas which have different industries and occupations. The broad range of dates and areas mean I will be able to make comparisons and track changes in how people refer to time.

I am looking forward to getting to grips with reading historic handwriting and connecting to people from the past through their own words. I’ll be sharing my findings throughout my PhD through this blog, and if you would like to ask any questions about this research, you can email me at s.v.mcgraw@keele.ac.uk

A cockerel crowing
One method of measuring time in a world before technology – the trusty cockerel.